Thursday, December 12, 2013

IPP and RI Process


IPP

IPP Research: 
  • YouTube documentary on China 
  • Different videos and articles on the process of the stage production of Chimerica
  • Started looking at different directing methods and practitioners


Contacts made: 

  • Mrs. Schmoon
  • Emma 

Questions: 

  • What kind of research am I going for? 
  • Who else do I need to contact? Should I be in close distance with Mr. Roddick and Mr. Black? 
Plan of Action: 
  • Preparations for pitch
  • Meetups with Sabrina to discuss overall concept and mise en scene 
  • Contacts with Reca and Austin and other teams to see if they're all on board. 

RI 

List all research:

  • Book 
  • Interview 
  • Web sources
Play: 
  • Hotel Splendid by Lavonn Mueller 
3 Connections 
  • Movement Analysis - space, rhythm, intensity, use of time 
  • Past Lecoq works with Complicite
  • His philosophies and how that relates 
Plan of Course: 
  • Research and Rough draft 

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

TPPP Draft Improvements

  • Transitions are needed.
  • Make an introduction and a conclusion; you must conclude!!
  • Make references to the pictures through the presentation.
  • You must have two world theatres.
  • Synthesis -- relate it back to other aspects of your TPPP
  • Don't get stuck on facts; stick to what YOU did. It's not reporting, it's processing.
  • Credits of the image on the back of the image.
  • REFERENCE MORE PRACTITIONERS. Use Stanislavski. Use Brecht. Use Bogart. Use Suzuki. Use quotes.
  • Theme of _________ in your TPPP

RI Research thus far

http://www.ecole-jacqueslecoq.com/en/biographies_en-000004_t9.html

Bridel, David. "In the Beginning Was the Body." American Theatre. 01. Jan. 2011: 44. eLibrary. Web. 19. November. 2013

http://dlibrary.acu.edu.au/staffhome/siryan/academy/theatres/..%5Ctheatres%5Clecoq,%20jacques.htm -- lots of other sources on this link that you should check out!

http://europamagna.org/pageshtml/Pgtheatre/SCOUT/StageIUFM/jlecoqeng.htm

http://books.google.co.kr/books?id=zD1oBFNGp84C&hl=ko&source=gbs_similarbooks --> Get it on Kindle.


·         Lecoq's influence has been seen in the work of seminal modern theatre companies such as Complicité, Theatre de la Jeune Lune and Théâtre du Soleil, and of such artists as Peter Brook, Julie Taymor, Yasmina Reza and Geoffrey Rush, to brush just the tip of the iceberg.

·         In training institutions in the U.S., hundreds (perhaps thousands) of acting teachers continue each day to explore the "territories of theatre" that Lecoq popularized for the actor at the famous school in Paris that he ran for almost SO years. Many such teachers trained with Lecoq himself; others came to Lecoq's work through collaborations with his previous students.

·         Christopher Bayes, now head of physical acting at the Yale School of Drama and one of this country's best-known teachers of the art of clowning, was a member of the now-defunct Theatre de la Jeune Lune in Minneapolis for five years, where he first came into contact with Lecoq's legacy. "I've been hugely influenced by my exposure to Lecoq's work," says Bayes. "How to think about the actor's performance, the architecture of the space, explorations of style - these are three elements of theatrical training where Lecoq blazed the trail."

·         Lecoq's investigation of the physical imagination stressed the importance of external forms - architectural, musical and theatrical. His criteria for training were based in anthropology, the study of gesture, and the anatomical study of the body in an aesthetic context.

·         He had a passion for the regies du jeu théâtral - the rules of the theatrical game. One could say, however crudely, that Lecoq worked "from the outside." He asked his actors to meet the rigors and demands of form and trusted that inner truth would follow; hence his strong emphasis on movement analysis.

·         In Lecoq's seminal work The Moving Body, Lecoq wrote: "People discover themselves in relation to their grasp of the external world. I do not search for deep sources of creativity in psychological memories."

·         Consequently, the base condition for Lecoq's actor is physical neutrality, a state that is achieved through careful adaptation of the body to bring about a kind of preternatural openness or availability, leaving individuality and personality behind.

·         In Lecoq work, form explicitly precedes content. Moving through Lecoq's program, a student delves into the study of commedia dell'arte, in which, as Lecoq states, "fixed external movements and the mask create the internal character" - again, the form coming first, the inner response in its wake. Even Lecoq's beloved clown, the most personal and intimate of his theatrical manifestations (and the messiest), is an immediately recognizable formal icon, red-nosed and topsy-turvily attired. The actor's innermost revelations as a clown are contextualized by the theatrical genre in which they are framed.

·         Lecoq's sophisticated and challenging work takes the student through a rigorous repertoire of physical and imaginative skills based in the universal poetic forms that Lecoq believed were timeless.

·         His graduates then carry with them into their future creative lives "various references recognized in the body," as Lecoq states - references that include clowning, commedia, character mask work (as first developed by Jacques Copeau), melodrama, even Greek tragedy. The body of a Lecoq student has been exposed to multiple formal, structural and stylistic demands. It is not by chance, certainly, that many Lecoq graduates have made remarkably adventurous directors, designers and authors.

·         "Lecoq's work asks actors how to live in their bodies and communicate physically with an audience," suggests Bayes, "not as a private experience to be viewed through a peephole, but as a public event, to be crafted and given away." This physical training awakens the imagination through composition, construction and the studied pursuit of artifice.

·         Joan Schirle, DelPArte's director, explains that the school continues to be guided by "Lecoq's commitment to a non-psychological approach to acting, as well as the mask as a metaphor for all actor training, and a teaching based on the dynamics of movement 'through the re-enactment of everything that moves, whether in life or on stage' (from The Moving Body)."

·         The impact of Lecoq's extraordinary body of work cannot be overstated. In his own words, he established for actors and artists "a permanent reference point that will stay with them for the rest of their creative lives." Schirle puts it simply: "Like Lecoq's pedagogy, we create a path of exploration for students to amass a vocabulary that allows them to make great theatre."

·         SPACE, RHYTHM AND THE USE OF TIME, INTENSITY, density and flow - all these technical ingrethents, parts of the language of Lecoq's classroom, were codified and examined in minute detail by the Hungarian dance theorist Rudolf Laban (1879-1958), whose body of work constitutes a second major source of movement training in the U.S.

·         As Lecoq asserted in his explorations of neutrality, LMA reveals physical idiosyncrasies to be combinations of a multiplicity of choices; thus, to overcome habit and develop a creative body, the student must radically expand his or her range of potential movements.

·         THE PRACTICES OF LECOQ AND LABAN, IN THEIR OWN ways, demand that the actor travel away from the self - toward the formal, the technical and the overtly theatrical - to inspire the creative spirit. The third major source of physical acting and training in the U.S., the legacy of Jerzy Grotowski (1933-1999), takes a different view.

Sunday, November 17, 2013

BTB: Response to David Park

My definition for what makes a truly great film is that I am a different person after watching it.
I urge your students to look beyond "good/bad" and allow themselves the possibility to be changed.

This is extremely pertinent in my life right now as I am addicted to movies. Seriously. It's becoming a problem as college apps are due in two weeks, I have my IOC on Thursday and numerous other assessments in different classes. I've especially been watching a lot of movies from the late 1970s to the late 1990s - some really amazing amazing movies. And more than anything, I've been focusing on different acting techniques of some of the greatest actors and actresses (MERYL STREEP). And most of these movies, I think I can say that my perspective of life or whatever has changed. I think this was carried by actors in the film amongst other things.

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

IPP and RI Update 1

RI research --

I've looked at a bit of Rudolf Laban and Jacques Lecoq and I'm certain now that I want to pursue the movement techniques of Jacques Lecoq utilized in the play Hotel Splendid by Lavonn Mueller.

After further research, I'm going to send an email to Ms. Mueller detailing whether my research question is solid and could be uniquely applied to her play.

The book I have looked at and will use copiously is called "The Moving Body or The Poetic Body (Literal translation in French)".

IPP --

I've read the play that our class unanimously voted on, "Arcadia". And though I think it is a WONDERFUL play, I'm not sure if it's the right play for our IBTA class for a number of reasons shared on Facebook. I think it leaves little exploration for the set and lighting which is detrimental for the process of Reca and Austin's IPP. I also think that given the circumstances where most of our class wants a speaking role in the play to further strengthen his/her acting techniques, it leaves only four major characters (ish) that really have a profound impact on the play. More about this discussion can be read on the conversations that took place November 3rd.

Here's a follow up post after that regarding other plays we could look into. I certainly will read all of these plays in the future at some point.

Okay, so I went a little crazy researching plays for the past few hours... And I think there are some other really good choices that we should look at. All of these plays won either a Tony or a Pulitzer or sometimes both, so I trust expert's opinions that they are pretty good.

True West or Buried Child - Sam Shepard
The Shadow Box - Michael Cristofer
Wit - Margaret Edson...
Clybourne Park - Bruce Norris
August: Osage County - Tracy Letts
M. Butterfly or Yellow Face - David Henry Hwang
Long Day's Journey into Night - Eugene O'Neill
The Pillowman - Martin McDonaugh (extremely creepy sounding, small cast)
Amadeus - Peter Shaffer
The Motherfu**er with the hat - Stephen Adly Guirgis

From these choices, I'm really liking The Shadow Box, August: Osage County, Long Day's Journey into Night, Amadeus and The Motherfu**er with the Hat.

Actually, I like all of them, so I suggest maybe you look into these plays?

I LOVE The Shadow Box and August: Osage County from what I've read so far.

But maybe we should attempt David Henry Hwang cause he's kind of the pioneer for Asian-American theatre and since a lot of us are Asian Americans... I'm not sure. I also think Buried Child is a really cool play and leaves a lot of room for exploration. And it's a style that we've seen, but not really experimented with.

Some of these plays I can see would be really hard to pull of though. We should probably look more into it and see whether it would be possible to do.

Here are some Wikipedia links for some of the plays that I still have up on my tabs list so it's easy to post. Other plays, it's super easy to find so
M. Butterfly: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._Butterfly
The Shadow Box: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shadow_Box
Clybourne Park: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clybourne_Park
August: Osage county: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/August:_Osage_County
Amadeus: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amadeus
The Motherfu**er with the hat: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Motherfucker_with_the_Hat

Saturday, November 2, 2013

Romeo and Juliet


I am very upset for two main reasons.
  1. It's over. It has been one of the most rewarding experiences of my life. Finally got to experiment with Shakespeare and met so many great people. I can't even begin to describe how closely knit the cast got this year. You know, some seniors keep saying "why can't time move faster? Why can't high school just end already?" They obviously are not a part of the theatre department. I keep want to extend my time at SFS as much as possible. It is filled with wonderful people and wonderful experiences that I want to prolong any time I have with them as much as possible. Really going to miss this in college. I'm not going to be one of those people that can't leave high school behind though. I'm just going to make sure that the memories I make here won't be looked at with regret, but happiness.
  2. My face wasn't on the poster nor was it on the ticket. I have a beautiful face and it therefore deserves to be seen by other people. I guess Christian deserved his five minutes of SFS fame though. I'll let you have this one Chris. I'll let you have this one.
Over the past few weeks, I have been a part of Romeo and Juliet. Let me tell you, it wasn't an easy ride. It was packed with bumps and sneak turns, but at the end, I think this play is the one I'm most proud of and the one I've grown the most fond with. That's right. It beats Judas. This blog will focus on my experiences with Mercutio.

As an actor, I've learned so much from my experiences with this cast and with this production. I had the joy of playing what many would argue to be the best character in this play to act as, Mercutio. And I would have to agree with them. He's certainly different. Really different. I don't know exactly how do describe him. Capricious in nature for sure. A genius. A joker. A sardonic drunkard? A boy who has faced some terrible things, but covers it up with wit and genius? Those are just some ways I would describe Mercutio.

I was definitely insecure playing this guy. I mean he's supposed to be the smartest guy like in all of Shakespeare's plays. Some people say that Mercutio had to die midway because if his presence remained till the very end, the focus would shift from Romeo to Mercutio. This is speaking from the literary aspect - I'm not saying that I would have outshined Christian or anything. He's a greater acting force than me any day I think. I
mean, I just think he's one of those people that was born to act on stage or the theatre. I've been seeing a lot of movies nowadays and I feel like he's better than so many young actors. He reminds me of a young DiCaprio. If you ever read this Christian, you better pursue theatre or film in the future man. Rooting for you! Rooting for all those in our class! :)

Back on track - my process with Mercutio... It took a while. I would say it took up to maybe the last two weeks? I just couldn't wrap my hands around who this character was and to be frank, I did not enjoy the performances of either Mercutio in the two films I saw. He also wasn't a character that I know on a personal basis. I don't know any geniuses personally who were tortured as children and views everyone else on a platform below them. I mean I guess I know some overly arrogant people that think they're too good for the world, but they're usually the biggest bimbos the world has to offer. Humility children. Humility.

How I got to the character was with much guidance from peers and from Mrs. Moon. I have in my notes that he's maybe not the most secure person in the world. There are traces of deep pain and insecurity in Mercutio that is covered by a layer of confidence - see the dilemma? And I would like to think that he has bi-polar syndrome, maybe which is funny to the audience? He was truly hard to grapple with, but such a great experience to play.

I mean, I'm still not content with my portrayal of Mercutio looking back on it even though random people came up to me and lauded my performance (have to have a little bit of arrogance mixed in with the humility right?). I actually didn't understand why I warranted praise though; that was not what I was expecting. I was expecting to be swallowed up by my death and ultimately overlooked because of the immense talent of both Christian and Georgia. Still confused because I truly believe that I did not do justice to the character; he's such an amazing character. I mean I thought I did well, but not to the extents that I was complimented. It may have been due to the genius of Mercutio.

I think a part of my discontentedness with my character was because I didn't necessarily feel like I
became him at many points during the play nor when I was actually playing him did I feel like I had a lot of intention. I would contemplate how to say a line or a word and what action I wanted to do with the phrase for long periods of time in my bathtub (where I get all my memorization and notes done), but during the actual process, my mind fogged up and all that came out of my mouth was words with no meaning behind them. I mean it wasn't like this all the time; I guess I was just disappointed I didn't implement my thoughts to action. I think saying it out loud during my rehearsal time at home would have helped. I mean I did say things out loud, but more whispered them and never went full out. I'm really insecure surprisingly. I would never ask my family or anyone for that matter to run lines with unless it was for the sole purpose of memorizing lines and not the intonations. I guess that's something I should change for next time.

At the end of the day, I felt that I should be much more emotionally involved in my character. I mean I saw people like Daniel and Christian who left the stage drenched in tears and sweat because they were so invested in the emotion they were exhibiting. Maybe our acting styles are different, but I would like to someday venture into some intense emotion on stage. And I think I'd be able to. I think I would just need to spend more time reflecting on my own character and the character I'd be depicting. But at the same time, I don't think Mercutio would have been a person to be extremely emotional about his own death. I think he would more be frustrated that his entire life - filled with endless possibility - had just ended. So in many ways, I think reflecting on it now, I did a pretty good job, just not one that I'm extremely content with.

I was extremely glad that we did Shakespeare this performance. The language is mesmerizing and I think every actor should experiment with Shakespeare at least once in his life to understand rhythm and poetry in language. Shakespeare's language and words are poetry and by maintaining a melodious rhythm and tempo through it, it's such a spectacle. As an actor, I've learned so much about my own ways of acting, tempo, musicality in the script, subtext... It was such a great experience for me.

As for the cast bonding, I've never felt so depressed after a show ending and coming together with these talented underclassmen has been something like a miracle. So much of the time, seniors like to put themselves on a pedestal saying "I'm way better than you." This year, there was none of that and I think we were the most welcoming seniors I have ever seen. I guess I'm biased, but I truly believe that.

This production finally had an immense impact on my passion and love for theatre. I mean I always loved it, but now I've cultivated a love for it that makes me consider theatre in my future life. Maybe not for my future career, but definitely for further study and involvement. It's such a special thing and with the arts dwindling perhaps especially in theatre, I think we should fight to keep it alive. SFS, stop putting your focus on sports and academics and try looking at the arts as a major part of students' lives for a change.

Though a painful journey, it was such an immensely rewarding one.

To leave, here's a video of our teaser and some scorched moments:
  • When Sarah sings -- anytime she sings.
  • Sabrina's enraged argument for why Romeo must die. Sabrina's reaction to her daughter's death.
  • The balcony scene - such love in the two.
  • Juliet's exercise monologue as well as her monologue before she takes her potion. Georgia's a force.
  • Christian and Annie's scene after he finds out he was expelled from Verona.
  • Christian's fight with Sammy
  • The girls when they yell 변태, 미친놈 to David.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7LJrlJOh0E&feature=share&list=TLgtOcfmO95-gNcYz_YoTeHoEcNKfiOFz7

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

David's visit -- Film and Theatre

  • How to get to film? Ideas start formulating from the age of 13; desire to involve himself into art. Loved immersing himself into art -- costumes especially.
    • As a filmmaker, he can interweave all his diverse passions of art into one.
  • Authorship of film. Who is responsible for the making of films?
    • What is a director?
      • What decisions does he make?
  • Film school is good for building a reel (portfolio) and making connections with peers interested in the same field. -- Interesting, because Nancy Kim said the exact same thing for her time at University of Toronto for theatre. She ended up making partnerships with directors, actors and made a team to pursue her interest in arts.
  • Problem with arts education -- you can't teach people to be a great artist. That's for life to shape. You need life experience to make films or art.
  • You don't have to do art in college to pursue it and vice versa. You can major in film or theatre, but be a businessman. You bring in the elements and knowledge from the arts and incorporate it into your profession.
  • Film is problem solving! This is what Gary Card said about his art.
  • Director -- Making the artistic vision; cinematographer -- camera work; production designer -- the physical devising of the world;
  • He has been a camera assistant; director's assistant; sound;
  • Before it starts, you have fantastical visions, and then during the process -- depths of despair. You have to suffer deeply during the process in order for the final product to be satisfying and successful in the arts. The arts are not a neat process.
  • "You just have to finish it." "Come to the table and stay at the table."
    • Output is needed in order to be an artist.
  • The fact that good movies actually exist is a miracle. A film is so difficult to produce. It's mind-boggling how good films are made.
  • Directing is such a collaborative art. Give creative restrictions. Create a scheme. Create a space where you can let the artists explore and create - best outcomes.
  • Be ready to be on set. I guess the same can be said for theatre. Am I right?
  • Rather have haters than someone say "nice job" or "that was a 'nice' video." It's exciting.

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

RI

Three prongs:
  1. The practitioner or theatre form
  2. The aspect of it
  3. Scene from a specific play and how it applies.
Things you notice about the RIs:
  1. Writing style is formal and to the point - does not linger on the subject of the practitioner or type, but goes straight into the play.
  2. 2500 words --
  3. Quotes on every page.
  4. Illustrations! They are very visual.
  5. Related themes/ideas and weaves in the play throughout.
  6. Annotated bibliography (10-15)

Monday, October 28, 2013

BTB: What The Body Does Not Remember

“The intensity of moments when you don’t have a choice, when other things decide for you, like falling in love, or the second before the accident that has to happen; suddenly they appear, with no introduction, important for me because of their extremeness rather than for the significance to be given to them. The decision to use this as a basic material for a theatrical composition is at least a paradoxical challenge, considering a theatrical event as repeatable and controllable. Perhaps when all is said and done, the body doesn’t remember either and everything is a subtle illusion of lack which helps to define or exhaust the game.” Wim Vandekeybus
I actually went to see the show so I will definitely be giving more insight on it later -- will write up on the weekend. I guess what I have to say for now is that the concept -- so interesting and that the actors take a risk by putting themselves through the capriciousness of their piece.

Sunday, October 27, 2013

Why Directing?

I'm not exactly one hundred percent sure how to answer this question as I'm sure my views will change and deepen as we progress through our IB Theatre Arts play this year! Right now, I think in a broad sense, a director oversees and orchestrates a production come into fruition. He/she does this by devising a mis en scene or an artistic vision to unify different aspects of production - lighting, set design, music etc. The director acts as the glue of the production, helping these elements coalesce into a new world the audience can venture into. Why directing? I remember Mrs. Moon handed us a sheet detailing the devising of a play through the use of creating new universes or worlds. Directing is the map bringing different lands together to form a new world.

Saturday, October 26, 2013

TPPP Outline

1. Pina Bausch
  • What is dance? Is it theatre? Is it sport?
  • Sparked the interest of physical theatre and conveying message through movement.
  • There are some things inexpressible through words, so we use the language of movement to convey certain messages.
  • The importance of set in her pieces and lighting in her pieces.
  • Diverse philosophies she employs.
2. Mark Hill
  • Anne Bogart and Tadashi Suzuki
    • Very intentional movements
    • Spatial awareness
    • 7 Levels of Energy
    • Viewpoints --
  • Very different from Pina Bausch in many regards, but there are many similarities (Butoh)
  • Grotesque beauty
  • Western vs. Eastern
    • Hara vs. The Sky
    • We have the western and then we have the eastern and then sometimes we have a mixture of both.
3. Andong - Korean Masked Dance (T'alchum)
  • A much more different approach to physical theatre than Pina Bausch or Butoh.
  • Rather than flowing movements, has more to do with characterization.
  • Unification of IB class
  • Satirical nature
  • Improvisation nature; playing off of the audience.
4. The Last Days of Judas Iscariot
  • One of the most meaningful experiences -- So many important questions
  • Now that I'm thinking about it, the first /play/ I've been in.
  • So many important questions; learned more about myself as a person.
  • Utilized lessons learned from Mark Hill and thought of ways of how I could characterize El-Fayoumy with movement (Pina Bausch)
  • Development as an actor.
5. Commedia
  • Striking similarities between Korean T'alchum
  • Characterizations
  • Satire of the society - reflects the society
6. Good Soul of Szechuan
  • Mis en scene
    • Use of everything we've learned thus far and apply it to the play.
    • Artistic process
  • Production elements coming together
  • The experience of the production elements - something not familiar to
    • Actually building the set, putting the lights up
  • Lighting -- The importance it bears in a production
  • The attempt to do a Brecht play and the sacrifices we had to make to uphold his theatrical style
7. Mother Courage (Bertolt Brecht)
  • The movie we saw also bolstered everything previously stated about the production elements, but more than that helped us understand Brecht truly.
  • A different acting style than that of Stanislavski, but still passionate nonetheless.
  • Meryl Streep is awesome.
8. The Tempest
  • Studied postmodernism
  • Helped so much with Romeo and Juliet
  • How the actors transcended the language barrier and communicated with their bodies and vocal expressions.
  • Also set in modern day like Romeo and Juliet
  • Staging, so interesting, gives inspiration to future plays to direct.
  • Music added so much to the play and so did lighting.
  • What can you use from this play to other plays in the future?
  • Elements of Anne Bogart, Commedia, T'alchum
9. Romeo and Juliet
  • Rhythm and musicality
  • Shakespeare's language
  • Communication through movement - essential
  • Character development
  • Commedia and T'alchum
  • Again, Mark Hill's lessons.
  • OMG THE TEMPEST.
  • You as an actor -- There are those who method act and then there are those who don't.
10. Philippines Service Through Theatre
  • Theatre as a catalyst for change.
  • Sparks a sort of confidence.
  • First experience with workshops.
  • Used Commedia, Korean T'alchum, Anne Bogart and Rasa boxes
  • Everything learned in theatre.
  • How to promote yourself in a positive light.
11. Water
  • Explained in former blog post

Sunday, October 20, 2013

The Crucible

Arthur Miller
  • Death of a Salesman, The Crucible
  • Was married to Marilyn Monroe
  • Cynical; middle-class citizens being harmed, social justice
  • Witch Hunt, Antisemitism, Red Scare, again and again, history repeats itself ; Miller lived familiar to all this fear.
  • Miller found motivation in the liberals who wanted to oppose the violation of civil rights during the Red Scare Interrogations but were too fearful to attempt.
  • In 1951, Miller wrote a screenplay called "The Hook", about union corruption on the Brooklyn waterfront.
    • Harry Cohn, the director showed the script to the FBI
    • Cohn then told Miller to change the threatening and murdering gangsters in the script into Communists instead.
    • Miller refused, and Cohn sent him this condemning telegram: "The minute we try to make the script pro-American, you pull out."
  • It is hard to let go of our belief that society must somehow make sense. Our unwillingness to believe that society is condemning and harming innocent people drives us to internally deny and ignore the evidence that is there.

Mccarthyism
  • The practice of making accusations of disloyalty, subversion, or treason without proper regard for evidence. It also means "the practice of making unfair allegations or using unfair investigative techniques, especially in order to restrict dissent or political criticism."

"As with most humans, panic sleeps in one unlighted corner of my soul." I'd just like to take a moment to appreciate Miller's skill with language.

Analysis of The Crucible
*Notes in book; taken from Sabrina's page.
  • Idea; The Special World (create a planet)
    • Dialogue/Anything in PoMo
      • Roots
      • Given Circumstances
      • Polar Attitudes (pendulum of change)
        • beliefs
        • prejudices
        • perception
        • tolerance
        • assumptions
      • Previous Action
      • Dramatic Action of the Characters
      • Character Development
        • Archetypes
        • Reactions
        • Speech patterns
        • Motivations
        • Etc. etc. etc.
  • The Crucible
    • Religious beliefs
    • Environmental situation
    • Social environment
    • Political environment
    • Economic situation
    • Geographic position
    • Time

Daniel Foley + Chad Austin

 
Shakespearean ACTING:
  1. Bite into the muscle of the verse. Burrow down.
  2. When learning lines, do it as meditative act like Anthony Hopkins.
  3. Keep your energy UP.
  4. Gesture at the end of a line to keep it lifted in your mind as practice.
  5. Give audience time to adjust as they get used to the language.
  6. Whisper your lines and then say them in a normal tone.
  7. Think of rhythm of the piece but don’t let it control you.
  8. If you can’t see the audience, they can’t see you.
  9. Standing at a diagonal is a strong position rather than a straight line.
  10. Disturb your space on stage.
  11. Take your soliloquies to the audience.  Dialogue with the audience. Engage in interplay between yourself and the audience.
  12. See the conflict of your piece and get it over to your audience
  13. Feel the rhythm with your hands, then your feet, then your whole body. Do the Flamenco.
*taken from Mrs. Moon's notes*

Daniel Foley's workshop was skillfully placed during our rehearsals for Romeo and Juliet. Everything we learned could therefore be applied to our characterization and presence on stage. He really stressed the idea of how we need to ease the audience into the progression of the play as the language is something that they are not familiar to. There are three ways to familiarize them with the language: first, to pace your lines well (slower in the beginning); second, to articulate everything you say loudly and clearly; and third, to use lots of gesticulation to help them visualize the poetry of Shakespeare's language.

We were also taught how to disturb the space on stage and to tell the beautiful story of Romeo and Juliet and pull the audience in. There's a rhythm to the language of Romeo and Juliet that we as actors had to maintain with our voices and our bodies. And the ends of the phrases should never drop.

With Chad Austin, we had a very short period of time with him so it was difficult to obtain a lot from his lesson. We kind of worked on the subtext of what we said by working on the exercise: Hey, How are you. We can say it like we met an ex, an enemy, a long lost friend. Everything depends on how we say the phrase. We also worked on how to act during audiences - to keep our heads up, to be natural yet avoid signs of the lack of confidence and unprofessionalism. This must have been very helpful for those who are auditioning for theatre programs in college COUGH COUGH George.




A Blog post dedicated to Romeo and Juliet will be up soon.

Postmodernist Plays Take 2!

Well, well, well...
Long time no talk blogger. It's been a long time since I've written these types of blogs, so please excuse the perhaps awkward nature of this blog post. But I guess I'll just begin?
I'm just going to drive right in and talk about the new worlds I journeyed into the past couple of weeks amidst the fall play, college apps and other pieces of school work. Despite the few hours this trek consumed, I'm so happy I took the opportunity to watch these plays. I'm still regretting giving that one ticket away! It's alright I still have What the Body Does Not Remember left - extremely excited for this one.

Picture of the set and music played. Projections.
The first show I saw - the Tempest - was spectacular. From all the shows I've seen so far, it's definitely been my absolute favorite. Sure the Russian was a little hard to understand, and I'm not the On a side note, I do not remember the names of the characters because it was in Russian.
best at following Korean text, but I'm pretty sure I got the basic gist of the storyline. Where do I start with this production? Scorched moments:  
 
  • Any moment when the doors open. There's always something completely different in the doors and the audience is kept on their toes clueless on what to anticipate. I especially loved it when the son of the king was dangling from his foot, the lighting was blue to simulate drowning. Also when the doors revealed a buffet of some sort. A really deranged play for sure.
  • The use of music to transition different sequences of events. The motif of the same tune woven throughout the play. Its live nature.
  • When the characters stood on the top of the stage overlooking the craziness transpiring below them - he was the one performing the magic.
  • The animal like state of the daughter. She was such a great actress. I wonder how it must have felt for her to be in a play with only men? Her name was Ariel and her dad's name was Prospero I think. Woah, I remembered some names!
  • The use of water at any point. So beautiful.
  • The wedding. Ariel's transformation.
  • The smell of the cigarettes they smoked on stage. So realistic. Granted, I hate that smell, but still loved that element.
In general, the play really revolved around images of marine life. We constantly see projections of the sea, of storms, of waves and of clouds on the minimalistic stage. It involved three sides of a wall with three doors attached to each one and a platform behind it to elevate the actors behind the walls.
The lighting was quite bare and in a few instances, the audience was lit as well. I would say the play was set in modern day because the costumes definitely show the bourgeois nature of the characters. There was, not to mention, a scene where the characters went on a shopping spree buying designer sunglasses and suits with a credit card.
What I absolutely loved about this performance was how I could understand the sequence of events and the emotions the characters experienced through their body language. I speak 0 Russian, but their body language really transcended the language barrier.
Here's a video clip of their wonderful performance:
 
The next play I saw was Victor Ou Les Enfants au Pouvoir. I think this translates into Victor or the
Babies that Can - loosely. This was one of the most absurd plays that I've ever seen in my life. I kind of got the storyline, but I think I would have been confused whether it was in English, French, German or Spanish. But despite the nonsensicality of it all, I was still awe-struck by the end of the performance. There were so many eerie, strange, interesting aspects of this production. I'm just going to share some scorched moments first:
  • The roots - the shadows made by them, their growth.
  • Shadows projected onto the side.
  • Victor's death.
  • Scenes utilizing the pool of water in the front of the stage.
  • Farting woman.
  • How the stage gets bigger and smaller depending on the emotional state of the scene. 
The stage was really cool. It had mobile walls that moved closer to the middle or expanded outwards depending on the emotional state of the scene. As the play progressed the roots grew and the characters got more and more insane and the storyline more and more jumbled. Loads of expressive dialogue and some really weird weapons and such. I'm still perplexed by this as a whole, but I think I'll come back to this play a little bit later - after more research into the play and the company.
 
King lear will not be discussed in this blog - everyone saw it so What the Body Does Not REmember will instead be discussed. AT that time more on Victor as well.



Wednesday, October 2, 2013

TPPP Classwork 10/2/2013

List of what you're SURE to include:
  • The Last Days of Judas Iscariot
  • Mother Courage
  • The Good Soul of Szechuan
  • Pina Bausch
  • Anne Bogart (Include pictures from Mark Hill workshop)
  • APAC Theatre - capture a picture that best captures the assembly of all mediums of movement theatre we ventured.
  • Shakespeare - the art of language
Paragraph on symbol:

        Water has been a symbol for my thespian endeavors from perhaps the onset of my IBTA journey. Metamorphoses by Mary Zimmerman really centered on this image of water. The symbol of water has so many philosophical aspects attached to it. It is a very malleable element; it can be frozen or evaporated and when we can motion the water to go different directions. I think this is like our state with theatre. We are constantly changing, perhaps evolving from our states. Water also has reflective elements. In Disney movies such a Mulan, we see the protagonist gaze into the water seeing her own reflection. Through theatre, I think I get a better understanding of myself - my beliefs and my personhood.


Tuesday, October 1, 2013

What the Body Does Not Remember

The debut of Wim Vandekeybus and Ultima Vez in 1987 stunned the world of dance of the time. In New York Vandekeybus and composers Thierry de Mey and Peter Vermeersch received the prestigious Bessie Award for this ‘brutal confrontation of dance and music: the dangerous, combative landscape of What the Body Does Not Remember’. In 2013, 25 years later and with a new cast, the show once again goes on a world tour.
Vandekeybus’ first choreography balances on the razor edge of attraction and repulsion. Sometimes this results in a confrontation between two dancers, then between two groups, between dancers and music, and between dancers and a compelling set of lines. But throughout there is an explosion of aggression, fear and danger.
Wim Vandekeybus: “The intensity of moments when you don’t have a choice, when other things decide for you, like falling in love, or the second before the accident that has to happen; suddenly they appear, with no introduction, important for me because of their extremeness rather than for the significance to be given to them. The decision to use this as a basic material for a theatrical composition is at least a paradoxical challenge, considering a theatrical event as repeatable and controllable. Perhaps when all is said and done, the body doesn’t remember either and everything is a subtle illusion of lack which helps to define or exhaust the game.”

http://www.ultimavez.com/en/productions/what-body-does-not-remember

Thursday, September 26, 2013

BTB: Bill Jones

I really love the concept of using ill patients for theatre. I think this is great for the audience and for the patient/actor. By using the arts as a means to purge and release their emotions, these patients are finding a conduit to express the inexpressible. A lot of patients need therapy to deal with the tribulations they go through and by releasing their sentiments through art, movement and speech. It's great for the audience to see and understand what these people must be going through.

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

The Pajama Game

*Found in the depths of my TA folder. Added a few details*

The Pajama Game is the game we're in and we're proud to be in the Pajama Game, we love it! 

The past few weeks have been a mixture of things. We've had our ups and inevitably in the painstaking process of putting on a musical, we've had our downs. But through the hardships, we've found a way plow through the stress and BOOM, resulted with a colorful, spectacular musical (in my opinion at least).

The Pajama Game is set in the 1950s, in a time of 'economic upheaval' and 'governmental chaos.' The plot of the musical thickens with mawkish, cheesy love story between the foreman of the factory, Sid, and the president of the grievance committee, Babe. They experience a clash between their work positions; Babe desires a 7 and a half cent raise whilst Sid must keep the factory running smoothly.

I had the pleasure of playing Mr. Hines, the time keeper of the factory. This 'job' or role was quite an interesting one. I found many parallels between him and El Fayoumy - they're both loud. Well I guess that's pretty much it. They're both loud. They both exhibited zaniness in their character and were pretty entertaining to play. I guess I had to face a few obstacles in the characterization of Mr. Hines. He is stern yet fragile. I had trouble finding the correct equilibrium between serious and humorous at times and could not discern between what seemed funny and what seemed serious. It was probably one of the most fun roles I've played thus far in my acting career. 

Overall, the musical was a mammoth success. The stage, the lighting, the acting, the music in the end was an immense product! :D 

Sunday, June 2, 2013

RI Japanese Theatre Notes

Tadashi Suzuki:
Movement and method of acting
    • Fundamental Theories
      • To act, one must have a point of view
      • For acting to begin, one must have an audience
      • To sustain acting, an awareness of the invisible body is required
    • Goals for the actors
      • Understand the different ways in which the feet contact the floor
      • Breathe through the nose
      • Send the energy through the floor onto the ground when stomping
      • Keep the upper body free, but strong
      • Be constantly focused an aware
      • Lose yourself in fiction
      • Keep the lower body constantly enraged and powerful underneath the center of gravity to support the breath and vocal instrument
    • Ten ways of walking: Stamping Shakuhachi
    • Standing Statues
      • You move from a standing pose and you freestyle
    • Sitting Statues
      • Different relationship to the floor
    • Activity
      • Trying out the ten ways of walking
  • The philosophy of Tadashi Suzuki
    • The rise of modern Japan
      • World War Two
        • Effects of the Atom Bomb
      • United States Influence
        • Capitalism
        • Globalization
      • Movement into the 21st century
      • Resistance to change
        • Modern Japanese Theatre
    • Globalization and Culture
      • Decrease in communication, decrease in Theatrical Appreciation?
      • Non-places
        • Welcome to the West!
        • Culture Extermination
      • Rules of Society
        • Theatrical Spaces
    • The Village of Toga and Theatrical Space
      • Form of Silent Protest
        • Artistic enlightenment outside of the capital
      • Dynamic Locations
        • Outdoors vs. Indoors
      • Audience and Actor Relationship
      • Creating the feeling of "Home"
Japanese Underground Theatre (Angura): 
  • Underground Theater
    • 1959-1980
    • Response to Shingeki Theater
    • Anti-American Sentiments
  • History
    • Old Theater Kabuki
    • New Theater Shingeki
    • World War II
      • Implications
    • Conformity to Ideals
      • Realism fo Stanislavski
      • Humanism
      • Proscenium Stage
      • Adaptation of Western Plays
    • New movement of the ARts
    • Against the renewal of the Japanese American treaty in 1960
    • Zengarukan student led organization
      • Violence
    • Rodosha Engeki Hyogikai
      • Working People's Theate
  • Major Angura Groups
    • Kurotento or the Black Tent Company
    • Jokyo Geikijo or the situational theater by Kara Juro
    • the Tenjo Sajiki of Terayama Shuji
    • The Tenkei Gekijo or the theater of transformation
    • The Waseda Shogekijo or Waseda Little Theater by Tadashi Suzuki
      • Later named as SCOT
  • Rituals: Relations
    • Kara Juro
    • Karawa Kojiki
    • Kabuki Theatre
  • Rituals: Historical Impact
    • The Fight for Independence
    • Shingeki
      • Selling out
    • Western Ideals
    • Against our people
  • Philosophy
    • Counter Cultural
    • Search for Meaning, Search for beauty
  • Oto Shogo
    • Passivity
    • Life is journey from Birth to Death
    • Distance audience to give them perspective
    • Silence, Stillness
  • Kara Juro
    • Rejected the traditional western stage
    • Beauty of the Human  Spirit
    • Flexibility in appreciating beauty
  • Terayama Shuji
    • Day to Day routine is meaningless
    • More Intense and Meaningful reality
    • Transcendent experience for audience
  • Tadashi Suzuki
    • Discipline of mind and body - centre
    • Choice
    • Battle on with the pride of the defeated
    • in the battle, you will find meaning
Noh Theatre: 
  • Brief history
    • During the Nara Period (710-794) 14th century sangaku was imported to Japan from China
    • Pantomime, actrobatics and magic, music and dance
    • Over the course of 600 years, arts shaped and develeoped
    • Nambokucho period
      • Noh was created
    • Hard to mark official starting date
    • Kan'ami
      • First to write and practice Noh
    • Zeami
      • Most well known practitioner of Noh
      • Kan'ami's son
      • When his father died, he was entrusted witht eh responsibilities and leadership of his father;s za
      • Wrote new plays as well as dialogues on the creation, existence, and ideals behind Noh
  • Characteristics
    • Combines elements of dance, drama, music and poetry
    • Written in the fifteenth or early sixteenth century
    • Recreates famous scenes from well known works of Japanese literature. Not a dramatic reenactment of an event but its retelling
    • Scenes are all actual spots in Japan, usually in the provinces
    • Buddhist beliefs influence Noh theatre
      • a person could not find spiritual release even after death if he is still possessed by some traumatic experiences of the past
  • Zen Buddhism and Noh
    • Japan bery much influneced by religion
    • Prominent during Zeami's time
    • Hana (flower)
      • the relationship of the audience to the actors and stage where they perform
      • feeling of perfect balance, mystic suspension in time
      • "To know the meaning of hana is the most important element in understanding Noh, and its greatest secret"
      • actors must train for years with the masters
      • symbolizes Divine Presence
  • Staging
    • Heavens
    • Bridge from heaven to earth
    • The four pillars are the directions so the actors know where they're going
    • Tree in the back
      • Japanese Pine tree
      • Common tree
      • Simple tree
      • Buddhist ideas of simplicity
  • Movement
    • Within each noh there are sections with names like kuse or kiri
      • chorus and musicians play together in rhythm while the shite dances
    • Basic Kata
      • The basic movement patterns of noh
    • Shiori
      • To express sadness or grief
    • Sashi
      • Uses the fan
  • Vocal Techniques
    • Utai
      • Vocal
      • Performed by the Shita and students
      • Keept the story moving
      • Ji-utai (chorus) sing to movement/shita's thoughts
      • Can sing in 1st person, not characters
      • No set pitch
      • Sings as one boice, no harmonies
      • Based on a 7-5 syllable count sung over an 8 beat measure
        • Three different types of matched rhythms
        • 2 types of singing style
          • Strong singing
          • non-pitch oriented singing
Kabuki Theatre: 
  • History
    • 400 years ago
    • Bright vibrant colors
  • Origins of the Kabuki Stage
    • Dry Riverbeds of Edo
    • Izuno No Okuni
  • Pre-Kanbun Era
    • Crude backdrops
    • Bare Noh stages
    • Marketplace Culture
    • "Scribble-Scrabble" art form
  • Kanbun Era
    • More complex performances
    • Legitimacy of Kabuki develops
    • Introduction of Hanamichi and the pull curtain
      • Hanamichi = Flower path
    • Crude backdrops
  • The first Theatres
    • Bofuku government's allowance
    • Stone and wood materials
    • Rapid development
    • Different types of design
    • Standardization of Hanamichi
    • Development of Keren
    • Seri
      • Trapdoors
  • Keren
    • The revolving stage
      • The first of its kind, invented in Japan
      • Was man powered by workers called "Anaban"
      • Wasn't electronically powered until 1911, when the Imperial theater was unveiled.
      • It's first use was the 1758 during the finale of the play, Sanjuseki Motome Mesume
      • It was used as a trick to cahnge scenes by the "divine power" of one of the characters.
      • Lights up set change "Akaten"
    • Seri (Trap door)
      • Developed in the Kansei era
      • Allowed actors to make dramatic introductions onto the stage
      • It was originally man powered through the use of a rope and pulley system
      • Was electrified in the 20th century
      • Modified Seri for the Hanamichi was the Suppon
    • Chunori (Wire Flying)
      • Reserved for characters with magical abilities
      • Adds on to the stage magic that a character can possess
      • Traditionally, an actor doing chunori, starts out on the junction where the hanamichi meets the stage and then ascends to the audience seats that are on the third floor
      • Used to be done with rope
  • Makeup
      • Simple white makeup
      • Black makeup
      • Wig, oil, and oshiroi (white paint)
      • Used to highlight characters
        • Earliest form of spotlight
      • Commonly used in Wagoto or soft style Kabuki
      • Destroys features
    • Rough Style
      • Telling action hero stories and for action comedies, folk tales
      • Clothes and makeup were very ostentatious and loud
      • mie
    • Kumodori
      • The makeup technique and symbolic meaning to the makeup in the Aragoto style of Kabuki theatre
      • Belief in yin and tang, provide symbols to the face.
    • Symbols
      • The belief in yin versus yang
        • Red is yang and is the color of youthful protective anger
        • Blue is yin and the color of bottled and resentful anger
      • Green = the ethereal and godlike
      • Purple = the rich and the noble
      • Each streak represents something specific to the character and so the actor may change but the makeup doesn't.
    • Oshiguri
      • Little ritual where they would put their face on a piece of fabric then they'd have a memento